18.01.2014, 07:48
Irgendwo hatte ich den folgenden Artikel schon mal verlinkt, finde ihn aber gerade nicht mehr:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/09/20/army-looks-to-mount-30mm-cannons-on-strykers.html?comp=1198882887570&rank=1">http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013 ... 570&rank=1</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/09/20/army-looks-to-mount-30mm-cannons-on-strykers.html?comp=1198882887570&rank=1">http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013 ... 570&rank=1</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:Lightly-armed U.S. Army infantry brigades need heavier firepower -- that means light tanks and bigger guns on Stryker infantry carriers, say senior leaders here at the Maneuver Center of Excellence.
The enemy's use of home-made bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan forced the Army to make vehicle protection a higher priority than mobility and firepower, MCOE Commander Maj. Gen. H.R. McMaster said.
But maneuver leaders maintain that the Army cannot forget about lighter units such as Stryker and infantry brigade combat teams that currently are not equipped with enough potent firepower to win fights quickly, McMaster said.
.....And we want to up-gun our Strykers. We can see the enemy; it would be nice to be able to kill them."
Currently, Training and Doctrine Command is working with Stryker program officials on a plan that could mean mounting a 30mm cannon on to the remote weapons stations on Stryker infantry carriers.
......
This would give much greater firepower and still not require a turret be mounted on the Stryker, Army officials say.
......
Lightly-armed IBCTs also need mobile protected firepower such as a light tank for forced-entry style missions, Army leaders began saying earlier this year.
......