06.02.2015, 17:34
Hier einer der besagten Artikel die der Meldung zum Ende der AIM9X Block 3 Entwicklung wiedersprächen:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://news.usni.org/2014/03/05/new-budget-preserves-navy-high-end-combat-power">http://news.usni.org/2014/03/05/new-bud ... mbat-power</a><!-- m -->
Mir scheint das Aviationweek (eigentlich eine Top Quelle) die AIM9X Block III mit der JSOW-C1 verwechselt hat. :?
Edit: Hier übrigens die Gesamte Haushaltsanfrage für das FY2016:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://comptroller.defense.gov/budget.aspx">http://comptroller.defense.gov/budget.aspx</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://news.usni.org/2014/03/05/new-budget-preserves-navy-high-end-combat-power">http://news.usni.org/2014/03/05/new-bud ... mbat-power</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:New Budget Preserves Navy High End Combat Power
The Navy preserved development of future combat power over the next five years in its Fiscal Year 2015 $148 billion budget submission to Congress released in briefing at the Pentagon on Tuesday.
The procurement documents — released on Tuesday — emphasize weapon systems over the Future Years Defense Plan (FYDP) that will fit into future Navy constructs, like the Naval Integrated Fire Control-Counter Air—or NIFC-CA (pronounced: nif-kah) designed to prosecute high-end air wars in the 2020s as well as next generation surface ship weapons.......
....At the same time, the Navy will also purchase 995 Raytheon AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles through FY 2019. It will also continue to pursue the development of the longer-ranged Block III variant of the weapons....
Mir scheint das Aviationweek (eigentlich eine Top Quelle) die AIM9X Block III mit der JSOW-C1 verwechselt hat. :?
Edit: Hier übrigens die Gesamte Haushaltsanfrage für das FY2016:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://comptroller.defense.gov/budget.aspx">http://comptroller.defense.gov/budget.aspx</a><!-- m -->